The Ferguson Insurrection
The execution of Michael Brown, an unarmed black 18
year old, by a white police officer on August 9, 2014 in Ferguson, MO, was
sadly not an anomaly. The response, however, has been.
Within
hours, the streets had filled up and shortly after, businesses were in flames.
And every night for weeks, it happened again. Each night spreading wider and
farther.
The
confluence of systemic racism and the feeble-minded, infantile bullying
mentality of those drawn into the police force unsurprisingly creates volatile
and deadly situations. Time after time, police murders occur with regularity
and largely without consequence. The explosiveness of the murder of Michael
Brown doesn’t arise from the particulars, but from the sheer crushing weight of
this reality. That fragile boundary between the threat of state power and
coercion burst and the rage flooded.
And
while that rage has waned, it hasn’t died. Coiled and ready to strike, the rage
boils just beneath the surface.
While
this unrest has been called many things, it should be referred to by what it
has proven itself to be: the Ferguson Insurrection.
The Promise of
the Insurrection
The promise of this insurrection lies in the fact
that while many groups have tried to own or direct that rage, none has
succeeded. Solidarity demonstrations have shut down mass transit in major
cities, but attempts to curb property destruction have faltered. Riots have
broken out with regularity and fervor in an ephemeral response.
What we
have been seeing is pure rage.
We are
seeing a crack in the veneer of a proscribed social contract that we were born
into. We are seeing mythos that goes back to the origins of property and the
external boundaries inherent to sedentary societies amplified as domestication
intensifies. States are built on the lie that we cannot exist without their
structures and defense. From the armies of Mesopotamia to the police of
Ferguson, MO, this is the tie that binds.
The
rallying cry throughout this insurrection remains simple: no more. No more will
these communities sit idly by as the pigs target, harass and kill. Some seek
reform, some seek justice, but the overarching theme is that the attempts to
suppress rage will no longer work. Complicity is no longer an option.
It
would be an absolute stretch to pretend that there was widespread thinking
about the relationship between this insurrection and the nature of
domestication. It is not my place nor any one else’s to attempt to own this
insurrection through critique and reporting. Nevertheless, the base complicity
with the law is an essential part of the domestication process. Conscious or
not, the refusal to accept the legitimacy of state power nor to succumb to the
mounting threats of an increasingly militarized police force is, on some level,
a breakdown in that process.
This
insurrection, like all insurrections, doesn’t hold answers. Even if it does not
seek them, there can be no divorce from the reality that people need to eat.
Societies must not only attack the state, but move beyond it. Until that step
is taken, the fate of those attacking is fully interwoven with the very society
under fire.
Yet the
rage still pours out.
And that’s where the beauty of this insurrection lies: it exemplifies the limits at which the domesticated begin to bite back. Context always matters, but it is the erosion of social control that exposes the possibilities that the infallibility and inevitability of power is a lie. Plain and simple, this is what it looks like when people hit their limits.
And that’s where the beauty of this insurrection lies: it exemplifies the limits at which the domesticated begin to bite back. Context always matters, but it is the erosion of social control that exposes the possibilities that the infallibility and inevitability of power is a lie. Plain and simple, this is what it looks like when people hit their limits.
It is
this rage that has been the final blow to civilizations past, present and
future. Anthropologist and historian Joseph Tainter famously observed that the
apex of collapse is the point of diminishing returns. That’s an economic positioning,
but it holds true for all social, ecological and psychological aspects of life.
If giving your life to serving civilization has only ever been met with
systemic poverty, being antagonized by police and being a talking point for
religious and political figure heads, then where is that return? Why take it?
In this
case, as in many others, this isn’t a proverbial or rhetorical question. If
you’re penned up, bullied, and killed by a state that is doing you no favors,
how much worse can it be once they are destroyed? The immediacy is telling.
This is the response of the human spirit, the human animal. This is the fox
chewing at its leg after being snared in a steel trap.
There’s
a part of the mind saying over and over again: we don’t need this. And the
façade, fortunately, is flammable.
The Limits of
the Insurrection
The problem with this insurrection, as with any
really, is that it becomes a reified. Community leaders, that is say the
would-be politicians (even the anarchist ones), eagerly champion the perceived
cause, often in defiance of the words and anger coming from the streets. Rage
is rarely owned by any one position, but that won’t stop the professionals from
navigating it.
We see
this over and over again.
Liberals
want to right the wrongs through reform. Conservatives want to demonize and
ghettoize populations. Both will do so while bolstering the overall power of
their militarized arm: resulting in military grade weaponry (tanks were a
common sight in Ferguson), seeking body cameras (rarely if ever helping
victims, but often used to identify and prosecute “suspects”), and allowing
space to deflect the “trauma of the job” onto management rather than focusing
on the pig mentality and logic itself.
That
last point can’t be overstated. Being over 13 years deep into oil wars, we’re
talking about a high number of PTSD-fueled jarheads flooding the police and
private security sectors (the private security world, by the way, is the refuge
of the discharged police). So while it’s easy to look at the increase in police
violence simply as documented by an increase in cameras and social networks to
share videos, that’s missing the point that this increased hostility can only
be a fraction of the interactions and incidences that these former-soldiers
were displaying overseas. This is a context that has not only been ignored
completely, but one where grievances have been hastily suppressed.
The
insurrection at home is a part of the global response to the globalized reign
of techno-industrial civilization. It’s just the part that we’re seeing. But to
separate this reality from the Arab Spring or uprisings throughout the world is
to buy this same lie.
So as
the well intentioned try to bring both sides to the table, they’re really only
ever-taking one: the furthering of state power and, at best, a relaxation of
the barbed-wire fences.
The
lack of a cohesive narrative apparent in what is an outpouring of rage lends
itself to outside narration. This is especially true as our “user-generated
content” society wants a Spectacle. We’re programmed to want a smooth story
arch. If anger in the streets is simply saying, “we have had enough”, the
sidelines are booming with a way to finish that sentence. The vacuum of power
is an implicit presumption that we create to remove that rage and contextualize
our external discussions.
The limitation of insurrection is the potential that it will die out through mediation. That is the goal of so many groups, religions, and states. That is the goal of domestication: to control the human being through diversion and redirection of impulses.
The limitation of insurrection is the potential that it will die out through mediation. That is the goal of so many groups, religions, and states. That is the goal of domestication: to control the human being through diversion and redirection of impulses.
This
insurrection continues to show its promise in its persistence and instinctuality.
We can only hope that the narratives of ownership and compromise fail to take
root. So that they won’t die off in textbooks, prison cells, and Twitter feeds.
This may not bring the end of civilization in and of itself, but it is a
testament to the refusal of complicity necessary to continue its existence.
This
may not be the final blow, but it is certainly a death rattle.
Alas,
as the ability of civilization to carry on requires complete subservience, may
the insurrection never die.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.