Inaugurated only last year, the focus of BAGR seems already in need of
adjustment. Kevin Tucker’s “Opening Editorial” announced that the Review would emphasize the promotion of
critique and discussion within the anarchist milieu. That milieu, sadly enough,
now appears undeserving of much attention.
A few
years back, around Occupy time, 2011-2012, various voices proclaimed the
ascendancy of anarchism. Its time has come, now is the opening to anarchism,
etc. This has not blossomed into anything, and Occupy is one place to explore
this failure.
The
spontaneous outburst of Occupy energy was aimed at the excesses of capitalism.
Even when militant, which was rare, it only amounted to more leftism. Occupy
Oakland was its high point and anarchists were quite active there, but, fatally
it seems, failed to add content to the Occupy energy. Supposedly post-Left and
even anti-civilization, Bay Area anarchists apparently provided no voices along
these lines.
A
potential turning point of Occupy would have been, for starters, to rechristen
it De-Occupy. But that would have constituted an actual turn away from the
Left, in favor of waking up to the indigenous dimension, and how very much
could be found there. Anarchists largely voted with the (rest of) the Left to
reject such a proposed name change, having been easily fronted off by a few
identity politics thugs who wanted to be in charge of the De-Occupy (or
“De-Colonize”) position. Our post-Left anarchists gave no voice to that outlook
overall and when Occupy fizzled out were left with the hangover of their
non-presence. Even now, it seems, little insight and even less energy can be
seen. A persisting postmodern haze prevails, where egoists and nihilists
compete to now even deny that reality is knowable. How this is anarchist at all
escapes me. It more resembles the insular scenes of cynical hipsters, offering
no analysis, no inspiration.
The
very ambitious To Change Everything tour in fall 2015 was a Crimethinc.
production, involving speakers from various continents. Civilization,
domestication, mass society, industrialism, and other institutions foundational
to our immiseration and the systematic environmental devastation were never
mentioned.
On the
other hand, there certainly are those who confront the nature of things, how we
got here. And put such concerns into practice, such as anarchists in British
Columbia and Arizona who’ve striven to be “accomplices not allies” to Native
people whose ties to the land have not been broken after all they’ve had to
endure, who still resist. The DOA (Dine-O’odham-Anarchist) black bloc, Phoenix
2010, was one instance among many of collaboration in Arizona. Others find a
helpful challenge in anarcho-primitivist ideas in lots of places, a phenomenon
that seems to be steadily gaining ground. An indirect testimony along these
lines is the Black Seed zine, which
feels the need to call itself the successor to Green Anarchy, even though its overall agenda is
egoist-nihilist-postmodern.
Many
things are at a low ebb these days and we don’t have a real clear picture of
where the anarchist milieu is at. It is clear that everything’s at stake and
that we are not interested in in-group parlor games. Anarchy seemed promising
pretty recently, but lately too much of it has almost no bearing on what is
going down, little interest in that, and not much relevant to offer. The
conversation about technology, for example, is apparently ignored by anarchism.
We are anarchists and in no way are we shutting the door on anarchists. But a
mammoth challenge faces us all, so we haven’t time to waste.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.